Portfolio and Risk, lesson 6
Factor models
Value, size, momentum and the few drivers behind many stocks.
Alpha from CAPM and beta, and regression on several inputs from Statistics and Regression.
Part 1. A fund that looks skilled
A simulated fund beat cash comfortably for twenty years. Measured against the market alone, it has a large, significant alpha. Add more explanations and see what's left.
The fund's apparent skill was two tilts: towards cheap stocks, and towards recent winners. Both earned a premium over these twenty years, and a market-only regression booked those premiums as alpha. Once the regression included them, nothing was left. Size changed nothing, because the fund had no tilt towards small companies.
Factor model
A factor model explains a return as the sum of its exposures to a few common drivers, plus a part of its own: R − r = α + β₁F₁ + β₂F₂ + … + ε. Each F is a factor's return, each β is the loading on that factor, and ε, read "epsilon", is the part left over.
Your turn
A fund's alpha against the market alone is 4% a year, with t = 3. After adding value and momentum factors, it's 0.5% with t = 0.4. What's the best reading?
Part 2. Where factors come from
Keep going with Pro
You've done the first part. Pro opens the rest of this lesson, and every other one.
- Where factors come from
- Fewer numbers for many stocks
- A worked problem
- The same thing, for real
Portfolio and Risk overviewSpotted a mistake? Tell us.